We tell you if your site can be powered, and who is already ahead of you.
Before you commit capital, not twelve months later at the connection enquiry.
Two fields, one sample. Work email only, please. See our contact form for anything else.
Connection is checked last and kills projects first
A site can be perfect on land, price and planning and still be impossible to power. The order in which projects check things is the whole problem.
Nobody wants to be the person who explains a dead site.
We do the reading. You make the call.
Give us a location, or just a requirement. You get back something you can put in front of your board.
The analysis is produced from a data engine we built. That is why it takes days rather than the weeks a manual study takes.
The grid publishes its picture, then overwrites it
Sixty dated editions of the connection queue, assembled into one comparable dataset. Nobody else kept it, and it cannot be reconstructed by anyone starting today.
Every entry, exit, size revision and delay, since 2018.
What moved, when, and which projects it happened to.
Including how often each year was revised before it was finalised.
Every number tells you how solid it is
Four kinds of people ask us the same question
Renewable and battery developers
Choosing between sites, or about to commit to one, before the land and design spend starts.
Data centre and large load proponents
You can find land anywhere. You cannot find power anywhere. The viable locations in any state are a short list.
Investors and lenders
Connection risk is the risk that surfaces last and hurts most. An independent read before the capital goes in.
Advisers and engineering firms
We sit upstream of the work you do. A fast screen tells you which sites are worth the full study.
Tell us about your project
Where you are looking and what you are trying to connect. We will tell you honestly whether we can help.